Feb 22, 2012
Young People in Politics
You know, I could say that the person who suggested this photo be taken will pay... but then she's behind in the opinion polls and there may be little point in adding insult to injury.
That's right, I'm on the Bligh Bus, and it's the end of Day 3 as I type this. No, wait - it's the beginning of Day 4.
So far, we've visited Rockhampton, Yeppoon, Clairview, Mackay and Bowen. Anna Bligh's announcements have been education-related, which she considers a strong suit. Tonight we fetched up in Townsville - just in time to catch up with the other mob following Campbell Newman about. Will their campaigns cross paths later today? My guess is no, due to the army of tacticians and event planners on both sides, but I'm happy to be wrong. We all remember that gentlemanly encounter between John Howard and Mark Latham during the 2004 federal election.
The big scandal so far is the revelation an ALP candidate made racist and homophobic remarks in an online forum. 19-year-old Peter Watson has now been expelled from the party, so won't run for Southern Downs, a safe conservative seat he was never going to win anyway.
Apparently Labor will have a look at its screening procedures; my suggestion would be including the question "Have you ever left a comment on a YouTube video?", and if they tick the "Yes" box, tear up their application. But then I've always thought the video-sharing service had the angriest, rantiest, whitey-est of all young male trolls. Apparently there are others.
The whole thing's made me think about the issue of young people in politics.
During the last week of state parliament (conveniently held last week), I had a chat with a retiring MP about recruiting the politicians of the future. He said it was getting harder and harder; mostly because your private life gets put through the ringer far more than in years gone by.
Anna Bligh said on Tuesday that it's normal practice for parties to run young candidates to give them some "political experience". A taste of La Dolce Voter, if you like.
The man who holds the safe conservative seat of Southern Downs is Lawrence Springborg. He was first elected at the age of 21, and is considered by most on both sides of politics as a respected hard-working MP. So age is possibly less of an issue to the electorate than relative levels of d**kheadedness. (Look, Mum, I made up a new word!).
Are young people simply in a better position to run because they have less history to worry about, and therefore potentially fewer incidents of demonstrable d**kheadedness?
Or is their eagerness to embrace the campaigning life, often before they've even left their teens, actually evidence of their d**kheadedness? Shouldn't they be out getting life experience first? But when was taking part in politics not a life experience in the same way as working as an accountant or a teacher or police officer or pool cleaner for wealthy widows?
Are the parties recruiting young people because those with the life experience take one look at politics and think "No way"?
Just some thoughts I've been pondering. Would love to hear yours!
Posted by Girl Clumsy at 1:35 AM
Clumsy Categories: election12, questions, travels
Subscribe to: Post Comments (Atom)
I don't think parties are recruiting young people because they are 'cleanskins' or because there is a lack of young people interested in politics.ReplyDelete
The reality is that these candidates are paper candidates: usually young hacks (with student politics or trade union involement) that are seduced by party organisations into running in 'unwinnable' seats.
Parties are damned if they do and damned if they don't. If they run a young candidate their lack of experience (and usually their location outside of the electorate) mean they are attacked by the media (think of Mark Platt or the recent Courier Mail hatchet job on Jack O'Brien). If the party organisation doesn't run any candidates they are also crucified by the media and the electorate.
All the curent glut of young candidates represents is a cynical move by party organisations to exploit the youth of paper candidates by calling it 'experience'. This is fine, although not when these candidates are later crucified by the media.
Last night at the Speakeasy I sang a song about my love interest taking a ride on my backside (which, in the context of the scene, had a heart shaped birthmark on it). Yeah. And I've been on the Management Committee of the party. Do I want to open my impro work up to public scrutiny as a political candidate? Probably not. I am I ashamed of my impro? Definitely not.ReplyDelete